SCRIPTURE: Jeremiah 13:22-25
Written by: Dr Conrade Yap
Date: January 10th, 2013.
"22And if you ask yourself, “Why has this happened to me?”— it is because of your many sins that your skirts have been torn off and your body mistreated. 23Can an Ethiopian change his skin or a leopard its spots? Neither can you do good who are accustomed to doing evil. 24“I will scatter you like chaff driven by the desert wind. 25This is your lot, the portion I have decreed for you,” (Jeremiah 13:22-25)Is it possible to live without God? Can people simply switch God off anytime they want? What about the strange logic that one can actually take a sabbatical from faith? This week, I want to entitle this week's article as "Can Anyone Live Without God?"
Can Christians take a break from God? It seems unthinkable. Yet, Californian pastor Ryan Bell of a Seventh-Day Adventist Church thinks otherwise. While many people around the world think about resolutions and make resolutions each new year, Bell decides that for 12 months this year, he would abandon his faith, stop praying at all, and try to live as if God does not exist. As an ordained minister, a pastor for 19 years, as well as a seminarian, Bell embarks upon his 12-month experiment through social media about his endeavors. Since then, it has been reported that Bell is struggling with losing a job, making ends meet, and at the same time, getting help from an unlikely source: Atheists. This may look like a publicity stunt, but when I read the report, it seems like Bell is embarking on a personal quest to try to live out his doubts in order to validate them. How successful will he be? I do not know.
A Year of Living Biblically," where Jacobs puts all doubts about the Bible aside, and tries to live as literally as possible what the Bible actually says. He follows more than 700 rules and regulations stipulated within, and especially the Old Testament. Since that year, he has given talks about his efforts and his biblical experimenting. People laugh, but he sure is serious.
Such experiments are basically reactions to something they are uncomfortable about. Jacobs is uncomfortable about the way fundamentalists are insisting upon a literal interpretation of the Bible. Others like Bell is uncomfortable with doubts amid his own ministry. It is an honest attempt to deal actively with deep troubling thoughts about doubts and what-ifs. Bell is not someone who has embraced change. He has converted from being a Methodist to Seventh-Day Adventist. He has shifted from fundamentalist positions to something more "progressive." So why is it surprising when he decides to take the leap from faith to unbelief? Moreover, this is a one-year experiment, which also means nothing is decided until the end of the 365 days. I find that such lifestyles tend to be more hype and reality. Three questions will frame the discussion. What is the limit of such experimentation? Is it necessary in the first place? Is it worth it?
First, where then is the limit of experimenting? What is there to stop us from embarking upon other radical experiments? What about Hindus embracing Islam, or Buddhists choosing to practice Hinduism for a year, or maybe a man living like a woman? The latter reminds me of the Mel Gibson's movie, "What Women Want." In dressing up and thinking like a woman, he gained something, but also lost something in the process. Empathy can only go so far. Eventually, the movie ends with Gibson needing to put back his masculine personality again. Failure to do so would mean him giving up the love of his life. All these begs the question: In trying to learn more about another world, are we unwittingly forsaking an essential part of our being? Bell is experiencing what it means to be ostracized as he walks away from his faith. It makes me wonder if he could have been more open and more collaborative about his project with his own community leaders in the first place? The way the churches have axed him from his job gives me that uncomfortable feeling that things have not been going well between him and the leadership there. Where then is accountability to the rest of the congregation he is pastoring? Is he causing a stumbling block to others? So what if he manages to survive this year and go back to the Church and his former lifestyle of faith? If we take this logic to an extreme, what then is there to stop anyone from becoming a radical terrorist in order to understand why such people hate America so much? The sky's the limit? Not really.
For faith is in something that is true and where we can anchor our hopes on. Only the truth can be that foundation. Apart from this foundation of truth, everything else falls in a matter of time. There is a limit in experimenting. Jesus has said that the truth shall make us free. We then need to exercise that freedom within the boundaries of obedience. Paul remarks famously:
"What shall we say, then? Shall we go on sinning so that grace may increase?" (Romans 6:1)
Paul then writes: "By no means! We are those who have died to sin; how can we live in it any longer?" (Romans 6:2)
When we have been redeemed by grace, we live by faith in the Son of God, who loved us and died for us. By walking back on faith in Jesus, we are essentially denying the One who loved us and died for us.
Second, is it really necessary to experiment before living? Is that not contrary to what faith is all about in the first place? We read in Hebrews 11:1 "Now faith is being sure of what we hope for and certain of what we do not see." The essence of faith is not about believing in something frivolous or mysterious. It is about believing despite not sensing it with any of our five or six senses. The third century doctor of the Church, St Augustine expresses this eloquently:
"Faith is to believe what you do not yet see; the reward of this faith is to see what you believe." (Augustine)
The point is this. Faith or not faith is not the game changer. It is the truth. We cannot simply sit back, shut our eyes, to pick and choose things according to our fancies. It is simply because there is the existence of truth which explains the big battle going on every day. For surrounding every truth, there is a ring of falsehood that tries to prevent people from reaching it. That is what spiritual warfare is about: the battle for truth. By willingly embracing the theory of atheism, Bell may have dug himself into something that is plastic. It is normal for people to have doubts about their own faith. It is not normal for people to swing to the other extreme to try to prove faith from the position of unbelief. Think about trying to prove a lion can be a lamb, or a mouse trying to live like a fish. In trying to prove a theory, such acts will make a mockery of their very own being. It is then not difficult for people to buy into other ideas such as having sex first before marriage, so that one can determine sexual compatibility. I saw recently an interesting catchphrase:
"If you wouldn't make her a wife, please don't make her a mother."
If we choose to experiment something so precious such as faith, what is there to stop us from experimenting other things? What we choose to experiment is a result of a deeply held belief. If we truly believe Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life, everything else must adapt according to this belief, and not the other way round. Faith is anchored on something true, firm, and steadfast. Doubts try to unravel these tenets of faith. It is not our belief in God that forms the truth. It is the truth that under-girds our trust and faith in God. The atheists begin with the premise of "There is no God." The agnostic walks between theism and atheism under the premise: "I am not rejecting any." The apathetic will not bother even to talk about faith, choosing to live under the umbrella of "whatever."
Thirdly, is such an experiment worth it in the first place? I do not think so. In the case of Bell, he has already suffered. His family too. It makes me wonder whether Bell's venture is a foolish one. Can an Ethipian change his skin or a leopard its spots, so says Jeremiah 13:22. Obviously, the prophet is saying "No way!" One can still empathize with the poor without having to go to the extreme as if the "only way" to understand poverty is to be poor. Some people may have that calling, but to straitjacket people into that shell is very much a foolish one. It is like saying, "Cyanide is poisonous? No, let me try that first."
Silly isn't it. It is more important for us to know and exercise our calling in life, than simply to prove a theory or a theology is true or not. For heart that is bent on unbelief is like the people that Jesus has said in the story of the rich man and Lazarus: "If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, they will not be convinced even if someone rises from the dead." (Luke 16:31)
Having said that, there are other experiments in which something good has come out of it. For instance, Alan J Jacobs confesses after his year-long experiment that "your behaviour affects your beliefs" admits becoming a better person, and more appreciative of the laws and regulations in the Old Testament. The unbelieving author of "When God Talks Back," Tanya Luhrmann, also spent several months living with and actively engaging with the evangelical community, just to understand the link between believers and God.
THOUGHT: "Day 387. It's been a week since the shave. The first day was the worst. I felt unanchored. Too many choices. It reminded me of the overwhelming freedom I experienced on that first day of freshman year at college, but without any of the exhilaration and double the dread. ..... Choice isn't necessarily a bad thing, I tell myself. And at least my year helped narrow my choices." (AJ Jacobs, The Year of Living Biblically, New York, NY: Simon and Schuster, 2007, p331-2)
Copyright by SabbathWalk. This devotional is sent to you free of charge. If you feel blessed or ministered to by SabbathWalk weekly devotionals, feel free to forward to friends, or to invite them to subscribe online at http://blog.sabbathwalk.org . You can also send me an email at email@example.com for comments or enquiries. Note that views expressed are personal opinions of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of any organization.